Vote

  • When a puppy reaches maturity it becomes a dog; when ice melts it is called water; when twelve months have been used up, we get a new calendar with the proper chronological name; when “magic” becomes scientific fact we refer to it as medicine, astronomy, etc.  When one name is no longer appropriate for a given thing it is only logical to change it to a new one which better fits the subject.  Why, then, do we not follow suit in the area of religion?  Why continue to call a religion the same name when the tenets of that religion no longer fit the original one?  Or, if the religion does preach the same things that is always has, but its followers practice nearly none of its teachings, why do they continue to call themselves by the name given to followers of that religion?

     

    If you do not believe in what your religion teaches, why continue to support a belief which is contradictory with your feelings.  You would never vote for a person or issue you did not believe in so why cast your ecclesiastical vote for a religion which is not consistent with your convictions?  You have no right to complain about a political situation you have voted for or supported in any way – which includes sitting back and complacently agreeing with neighbors who approve the situation, just because you are too lazy or cowardly to speak your mind.  So it is with religious balloting.  Even if you cannot be aggressively honest about your opinions because of unfavorable consequences from employers, community leaders, etc., you can at least, be honest with yourself.  In the privacy of your own home and with close friends you must support the religion which has YOUR best interests at heart.


Comments